From cointelegraph by Shiraz Jagati

FOLLOW UPCOINTELEGRAPH IN YOUR SOCIAL FEEDFollow ourSubscribe on

Michael Saylor’s comments on Oct. 21 about Bitcoin custody caused a furor among the crypto community, sparking debates over self-custody and the future of crypto adoption.

Saylor, himself the executive chairman of software company-cum-Bitcoin BTC$69,373 investment vehicle MicroStrategy, faced intense criticism after suggesting that Bitcoin holders should trust their assets to “too big to fail” banks while dismissing self-custody proponents as “paranoid crypto-anarchists.” 

As expected, the backlash was swift and severe, with Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin calling the comments “batshit insane,” while several other prominent members of the crypto community — including Zap founder and CEO Jack Mallers and prominent software engineer Jameson Lopp — sharing a similar sentiment.

Saylor amended his comments soon after, affirming his unwavering support for self-custody rights. The development was of particular importance, especially given that MicroStrategy recently revealed it had custody of 252,220 BTC (about $18.2 billion).

The great divide

While offhand comments from a businessman could at first seem trivial, the incident has exposed a deepening ideological rift in the Bitcoin community between maximalists advocating for full decentralization and those embracing institutional involvement in the crypto industry. 

Nate Holiday, CEO of decentralized data developer Space and Time, told Cointelegraph that the tension reflects fundamentally different objectives for crypto. 

Saylor’s MicroStrategy is focused on investment and treasury management to create wealth for its shareholders, Holiday said, adding:

“Their goals are benefitted when Bitcoin’s price goes up, and institutional adoption has the ability to accelerate this goal. Most people building Web3 tech are working toward a broader goal: decentralizing technology to enable a verifiable world that doesn’t require trust between intermediaries.”

For many in the crypto industry, self-custody represents more than just a technical preference. Rather, it is a cornerstone of Bitcoin’s revolutionary potential.